The Relationship between Crime and Poverty
There are contradictions and
self-imposed myths that continue to manifest in our society that begs for
critical assessment, engagement and analysis. Relatively we have a serious misunderstanding
and misinterpretation of the relationship between crime and poverty, because
ignorantly we have no appreciation of the historical constructs of our country
and the current socio-economic status quo that are contributing factors to
crime.
Fallacious arguments
continue to manifest in our social circles that misunderstand reasons and
sources of unfavorable violent social behavior. Strategies, policies, financial
and human resources have been availed to “fight and combat crime”, yet these
blanket interventions, including the community policing initiative, the ‘neighborhood
watch’ that operates in affluent locations with very racist tendencies, have
failed to prevent crime as evidence corroborates with news in our daily
newspapers. What we have set forth is a counter-revolutionary anti-black
precedence of launching war against the wrong enemy, engaging on the wrong
battlefield and fighting with the wrong weapons.
An analysis from NAMPOL’s weekly crime bulletins
of 2015/2016, illustrates that about 99% of the
population in prison are from the black community and only 1% or less are from
the white. Studying the reports further reveals that as compared to whites,
99,5% of blacks are relatively involved in crimes from armed robberies,
assaults, theft, house break-ins, gender based violence, rape and murder cases.
While a breakdown of the findings inform that more blacks under 35 years old more
are involved in these crimes. Alarmingly less than 25 years old are more than
79 times more likely to be arrested for theft, murder or violent cases, hence
on per capita basis; blacks commit more violent crimes than whites do.
All this crimes are
characterized by common triple challenges of unemployment, poverty and
inequalities. It is young people presently disadvantaged; it is young people
that commit these crimes who are not in education, employment or training. And
they all live in neighborhoods characterized by poverty. Because of this structural
displacement, desperation, dehumanization and hopelessness, last options are to
disengage and employ survival strategies of crime to keep up and provide for
themselves and their families.
These triple challenges of
poverty, unemployment and structural inequalities are born from a historical
construct of white men’s colonialism and the apartheid legacy. For instance,
the classical deliberate displacement that birthed Katutura which further extended
to informal settlements; the subsequent birth of black markets and the Bantu
education system; exacerbated by the dispossession of urban land and farms unjustly
acquired and compounded by the strategic economic sectors in the hands of the
minority few who are white.
Crime is also provoked by
the government of the day that have paid less attention and effort to address
the manifestations and contradictions of the colonial and apartheid legacy and
having failed to re-imagine, reconstruct, develop and deliver a cured, just, thriving
and inclusive society beyond rhetoric. As a result blacks are institutionally excluded
from social, political and economic opportunities. This are realities that
explains the reasons for crime committed by young black men.
Often politicians misunderstand that peace, stability and unity cannot prevail within a society that is characterized by poverty. What is thus needed is a systematic response from all stakeholders of society, which should be aimed at service delivery, and the tackling of material differences aimed at uplifting the poor and bettering the lives of all. Moreover, our solutions should be
combined with radical development and empowerment interventions to restore the
dignity of the black man and woman. Instead of slogans and symbols, making institutions more
inclusive is about changing the politics of a society to empower the poor,
disenfranchised and the excluded. Social investment, to youth
in rural communities, to the delivery of basic services from housing, electricity, water and free unconditional inclusive decolonized education
funded by our natural resources, should be encouraged. Also education is key, for educated citizens and
communities with higher education degrees report a higher level of employment, health
and happiness. In fact, societies with a high rate of degree attainment have
lower crime rates and higher rates of social welfare.
As Motsohi (2016) highlights; the International Labour Organization has pointed out that; “young men and
women are among the world’s greatest assets. They bring energy, talent and
creativity to economies and create the foundations for future development”,
however Freedman stated; “without a stake in the system, [young people] are
more likely to become alienated and engage in anti-social behaviour (Freedman,
2005:4). It is philosopher Aristotle that warned a thousand years
ago that: “poverty breeds criminal behavior”. He meant to say that in politics
poverty is the parent of revolution and crime.
Mathemetically, there is a direct relationship between crime and poverty. And it shall remain so and even grow worse for as long as people's lives remains unchanged and unchecked.
* Matheus Pendapala Taapopi
·
Sources;
Namibian Police; Weekly Bulletins.
Retrieved from: http://www.nampol.gov.na/web/nampol/crime-bulletin
·
Thabang Motsohi (2016).
Retrieved from: http://thoughtleader.co.za/thabangmotsohi/2016/07/29/tackle-inequality-vigorously-to-reduce-racism-and-other-social-pathologies/
Comments
Post a Comment