Challenging the Dependency on Foreign Aid
Foreign
aid a tool of diplomacy, a noble cause that has done a lot of good, but giving and
getting money can only feed the hungry and help the sick, it does not free
people from institutions that make them hungry and sick. It does not free the
poor from the system which deplete their opportunities and incentives, as aid
can provide band-aid solutions to alleviate immediate suffering, but by its
very nature cannot be the platform for long-term sustainable growth.
The
most disheartening fact is that government’s critical social programs still
depend on foreign aid and international partnership, at a Health PPP Conference
(2014), former President Pohamba admitted that, “…over the years, donor health
financing has been declining, and this impacts both the funding levels and the
technical ability to deliver quality, effective accessible health care
services.”This is proof that the aid system encourages governments to pick up
the phone and ask the donor agencies for next capital infusion.
The
idea that donations remedy poverty has dominated the theory of economic
development and the thinking in many international aid agencies and governments
ever since the 70’s, and when results questioned, all are negative. Yes,
millions have moved out of abject and wretched poverty in the world over the
past six decades, but that has had little to do with foreign aid, rather it was
due to economic growth in countries of Asia that has received little aid. Moreover,
poverty cannot be eradicated with more and more aid. For poverty is instead
created by economic institutions that systematically block the incentives and
opportunities of poor people to make things better for themselves, their
neighbors and country at large.
Hence,
foreign aid is not the answer to our continent’s economic and social troubles;
and in fact, aid is a factor contributing to Afrika's underdevelopment woes. Aid
dependency pulls entrepreneurship and intellectual capital into non-productive
activities, thus foreign aid leads to the situation where we have failed to set
our own pace and direction of development that is indeed free of external
interference. International agencies, including the International Monetary Fund
(2005) published a report; "Aid Will
Not Lift Growth in Afrika." The report cautioned that governments,
donors and campaigners should be more modest in their claims that increased aid
will solve our problems. Despite these comments, no serious efforts have been
made to wean us off.
Foreign
aid has also unattractively contributed to negative investment, for no investor
would want to risk money in a country that is unable to stand on its own feet
and manage its own affairs in a sustainable way. While, Dambisa Moyo, an
economic analyst and author of ‘Dead Aid;
why aid is not working.’, opined in a subtle way, that the aid culture has
left the rainbow continent more debt-laden, more inflation-prone, and more
vulnerable to the vagaries of the currency market. It is also obvious that aid
has been linked to rampant corruption. Aid flows destined to help the average
Afrikan end up supporting bloated bureaucracies in the form of the poor-country
governments. A radical pan-Afrikan activist, Mawuna Koutonin argued that “aid
and humanitarianism is a humiliation for our people, our continent, and we
should do our best to get rid of it as soon as possible, to recover our lost dignity.’’
In
the final analysis, economies that rely on commitments of aid almost fail, and
those that depend on innovation succeed. The latter is true for economically
successful countries such as China and India, and even closer to home, South
Afrika and Botswana. Their strategy of finance development, emphasizes the
important role of entrepreneurship and markets, over aid system that preaches
hand-outs. Governments need to attract more foreign direct investment by investing
in education, creating attractive tax structures and reducing bureaucratic and
complex regulations for businesses. We should also focus on increasing trade; China
is one promising partner.
Making
institutions more inclusive is about changing the politics of a society to
empower the poor, disenfranchised and excluded repressed by monopolizing power.
Again aid helps, but it just needs to be used in such a way to help civil
society mobilize collectively, find a voice and get involved in decision
making.
Another
proposition is for all branches of government and civil society to reduce their
budget, and finance dependency from foreign aid about 10 to 20% a year. And a
review of effective dependency reduction and rehabilitation progress could be
done yearly, with such a progressive system in less than 10 years, our country could
get out of foreign aid dependency. Once this is achieved, only trade and
diplomacy will be the philosophy of Afrika and Namibian foreign relationships. Ten
years in the life of a state is not much, and courageous patriots would attain
that goal even faster with discipline and consistency.
* Matheus
Pendapala Taapopi is a 3rd year student studying towards a Bachelor of Public
Management (Hons) at the University of Namibia.
Comments
Post a Comment