Switzerland’s 7 Presidents, a good model of governance
Switzerland doesn’t have a President
or Prime Minister acting as a Head of State nor a Head of Government. The
country is managed by a seven-members Council which is considered as a
collective Head of State. One member of the council is considered the President
of the Confederation but he is just a primus
inter pares, which means “first among equals” 7 members of the Federal
Council. He/she acts in that role for 1 year, and the duty of presidency
rotates among the members in order of seniority, then the previous year’s Vice
President becomes President. The President of the Confederation is not
considered the head of State; rather the entire Federal Council is considered a
collective Head of State.
The President main role is to assume special
representational duties. He has no powers above the other Councilors and
continues to head his or her department. For not having any single Head of
State, the country also carries out no state visits. When traveling abroad, the
President does so only as an ordinary Minister of a government Department.
Visiting heads of state are received by the seven members of the Federal
Council together, rather than by the President of the Confederation. Treaties
are signed on behalf of the full Council, with all Federal Council members
signing letters of credence and other documents of the kind.
Like
Namibia, Switzerland is a multicultural country with 4 different ethnics
groups: 65% of the population is German; 18% French; 10% Italian; 1% was
Romansh; and 6% comprises of various other groups. Equally, about 50% of the
Namibian population belongs to the Awambo tribe and 9% to the Kavango tribe;
Herero 7%; Damara 7%; Nama 5%; Caprivian 4%; Bushmen 3%; Baster 2% and Tswana
0.5%.
Given that democracy is unfair against the minority, and that most of our
political parties are founded upon ethnic representation principles. The
majority group easily wins all democratic elections, but mighty Switzerland
adopted a federal model that in fact gives enough power to each ethnic group to
manage their local affairs, speak and administrate in their language, and at
the top executive level the collective nature of the federal council works well
to reinforce the sense of community of destiny.
This model has got progressive
advantages, first, it embraces ethnic identity thus integrates and minimizes
ethnic conflicts in the context a multi-ethnic country. Secondly, the multi
heads of state, are all equal in opinion and power, making it difficult to take
impulsive decision, and minimize the risk of dictatorship. Thirdly, it minimizes
corruption of leadership in the sense that any top level decision could not be
taken without sound review by the members of the council. Fourthly, as all
seven members have to sign top level decisions to be valid, external pressure
on one or two members of the council will not be enough to move a decision
ahead. Finally, leadership based on showmanship and cult of personality is
severely limited, and the leaders are more focused on delivering results in
their departments.
In The
Prince, Machiavelli said, the weakest form of government for any nation is
dictatorship or one-powerful-man at top, because it’s easy to conquer such
nations. Once you succeed to cut the head, the whole falls into panic and
concedes defeat. On the other hand, the most resilient nations are those with
multiple, strong, and independent local princes. Even after the central
government of such nations would fall, any conqueror would have to battle all
individual princes to win over the country.
In 1976, in
China, after Mao died, the Chinese Communist Party vowed never to let a single
person, whatever his position or charisma, to have so much power to lead to the
horrific deeds of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Deng Xiaoping, Mao’s
successor, stripped himself of all the powers he has got as president, and
transferred them to what was called the Eight Elders, which ultimately would
accomplish the most transformational endeavor in human history which lifted
more than 800 million people out of abject poverty in China, and reached a
level of development that Europe succeeded to accomplish only over 400 years. For Chinese, the state’s affairs are not a
matter of opinion, intuition, impulse, emotion, religion, personal preferences
or lineage, but based on the scientific approach of ”seek truth from facts” in
political and economic affairs, a good philosophy which Namibians in general
and politicians should subscribe to.
These model
would give enough power to each ethnic groups to be equally represented on the
table, to directly manage their local affairs, speak and administrate in their
language as this would further uphold, promote, protect and preserve each culture
and their traditional principles. I herewith make a challenging proposition, to
learn, and constructively debate to adopt this model.
Matheus Pendapala Taapopi
Comments
Post a Comment