UNAM SRC; A Body Totally Compromised
There
are self-imposed myths, limitations and serious contradictions in the UNAM
management, and SRC that beg for an honest engagement and critical analysis.
The student body’s potential to produce and nurture leaders of an astute
intellectual and social caliber, is confined and reduced to false notions that
novices that consumed university literature, popular for the wrong reasons, in
favor with management, with an average academic record, and a sense of leadership
experience qualifies a student to be SRC member. This is a fatal flaw and has
set forth a bad precedence for the past, present and future SRC, and has thus devalued
the body, rendering it ineffective and out of touch with the masses.
The
SRC lacks political orientation and consciousness, members are not held
accountable, while the financial process is a bureaucracy that lacks
transparency. The SRC Constitution is vague and begs for critical amendments,
to reflect and respond to the needs, demands and characteristics of the current
state of affairs. While both the SRC and Electoral Commission equally lacks
independence from management.
This
has created a situation where the SRC decide the fates of the students without
their active contribution to those decisions; the SRC should not act a decision
making body, but a decision implementing body! Students have been reduced to a
mere voting fodder that is only seriously engaged at the SRC Manifesto, when
candidates want their votes, only to be remembered the following year for the
same reason. Students are not engaged on every issue, students are not leading
with the SRC and ideas are birthed without their input.
The
SRC doesn’t exist in a vaccum, it is an integral component of a broader pattern
of representatives in society. Hence the individuals who get elected are not
just for the SRC and its university but are the face of the future of this
country and it’s a future that has been compromised. The SRC now genuine
representatives of management continue to be more invested and ever dedicated
to entertainment events instead of policy reform.
As
a result UNAM is no longer a factory where student leaders are made; it is not
a breeding ground for political leaders, for they don’t find a voice or inspiration
here. This is because UNAM management doesn’t tolerate and promote academic
thought and freedom, especially radical and militant views.
In
that regard, if it is to achieve the objectives that are espoused in its
constitution, the SRC should assume their responsibility to be that of
determining the politics of the day and leading public opinion. The SRC should
assume the role of activism, as Mngxitama observes; “it has to be a weapon of students against ignorance,
injustice, racism, patriarchy, homophobia, tribalism, neo-colonialism, and
against oppression, exploitation and discrimination.”
This responsibility will require the SRC to stand on clear
intellectual and ideological grounds of Pan-Afrikanism, Radical Feminism and
Black Consciousness. The SRC must be in liason with NANSO, the umbrella
of student activists and the political umbrella of all students.
The
SRC must be a body capacitated with individuals that have a contextual and
practical understanding of student governance; this will ensure their ability to
contribute significantly to broader objectives of national development and
serve as a cornerstone of policy analysis for government.
This
is a humongous responsibility that needs the most dedicated and capacitated
crop of student leaders, it is not a task for any ambitious student. This is
because leaders are made, not born, and the notion that “everyone is a leader”,
perpetuates an untruth that has found home in the minds of young people that
are politically unconscious, they are going to fail dismally to locate the SRC
in the broader sense of politics of society it belongs.
* Matheus Pendapala Taapopi is
a third-year student, studying towards a Bachelor of Public Management (Hons),
at the University of Namibia.
*UNAM = University of Namibia
*SRC = Students Representative Council
Comments
Post a Comment